Best Chess Tactics Trainers and Puzzle Sites

For many improvers a free trainer is enough: Lichess puzzles come with no paid tier, and a paid site is worth considering only if you want its history, themes or scheduling features. This page is based on published documentation, pricing and reports. We could not confirm ChessTempo's price: its pages returned HTTP 403 to us on 8 November 2026, so its figures here are unverified.

ChessCourseFinder has not joined any affiliate program, so links here earn nothing today. Read our affiliate disclosure.

Test depth: Public information only. Nobody at ChessCourseFinder has used these trainers or paid plans. This page uses vendor pages and linked sources read on 8 November 2026. How we review explains the limits. This page is part of our skills guides.

This page covers puzzle sites, apps and puzzle-set methods. Taught courses such as Tactic Ninja are on the tactics courses page; mating patterns have their own page.

What to use, by level

• Under about 1000: Lichess puzzles, daily, and read the solution every time. Free.
• About 1000 to 1800: Lichess or Chess.com puzzles; consider a repetition method (a puzzle set solved repeatedly) once you can solve most puzzles but are slow.
• Above about 1800: a set method such as Woodpecker is aimed at stronger players. GM Noel Studer's article recommends the book from about 1800 FIDE (see below).

How we chose

What each trainer states it offers: where puzzles come from, whether it schedules repetition, what is free, and what it costs. We did not rank puzzle quality; we cannot judge that from pages.

What separates one tactics trainer from another

Once a site has enough puzzles, six features decide whether it suits you. Before comparing prices, decide which you actually need.

1. Volume without a cap. If you plan 20 puzzles a day, a free limit of three settles the matter.
2. Choosing a theme. Drilling forks only, or mates only, is a different job from solving a mixed set.
3. Control over difficulty. Studer's rule below needs a way to make puzzles easier or harder.
4. No clock. Studer's article says timed modes only suit fast chess and players who are already about 2000 or above.
5. Repeating what you missed. This is where paid plans and set methods try to earn their price.
6. Puzzles from your own games. They target your errors, not an average player's.

"Not confirmed" means the pages we could read did not say, not that the feature is missing. Sources: Lichess Puzzle Themes, Chess.com membership comparison, Listudy, Chessable 3.0 announcement.

The options

Sources for statements: Lichess Patron page, Chess.com membership comparison, Aimchess App Store listing. Confirm prices where you pay.

Lichess puzzles in more detail

Lichess is the default recommendation here because its free feature list is the longest we could read. Its themes page listed 6,504,185 puzzles under "Healthy mix" on 8 November 2026, and you can filter by motif, by game phase, by opening, by mate length and by puzzle length, from one-move (976,626) to four moves or more (521,390). It also lists a Puzzle Dashboard with "Improvement areas" and "Strengths", puzzle history, and puzzles generated from your own games, and it says the puzzles are public domain. Downside: we found no automatic schedule for repeating missed puzzles, so you have to do that yourself.

Chess.com puzzles

Basic gives three puzzles a day, which is 21 a week or about 1,095 a year. That covers a small warm-up only. Gold lifts the limit, but we could not confirm its price, so check Chess.com's plans directly if you already play there and want everything in one place. If puzzles are the only reason to pay, Studer's article makes the same point we would: Lichess does that job for free.

ChessTempo

ChessTempo's pages returned HTTP 403 and we did not try to work around it. What we know comes from search snippets: a Gold membership with problem history, bulk PGN download and spaced repetition, plus free Gold for titled players through the site. We did not see a price. Do not rely on this row until you have checked the site.

Two third-party pages we could read describe it, and both are old and come from businesses in chess. Chessify's list, dated 27 June 2023, says it has 80,000 tactical puzzles and 10,000 endgame problems taken from real games. A Chess Gaja trainer (the page shows no clear date; its images and links point to 2022) calls it freemium and says the free version is enough for most of that school's students. Treat both as dated descriptions, and treat the idea that free ChessTempo is enough as one coach's view. Downside for this guide: it is the one major trainer here we could not read at all.

Woodpecker Method

The method, as Chessable describes it, is to solve a set over about four weeks, then repeat it five or six more times, each cycle taking roughly half the time, until the set takes a day (Chessable explainer). Downsides: a Chess.com user's 2022 review of the book found it improved tactical vision but was time-consuming and frustrating, with less improvement in real games than in puzzle ratings; it is one person's opinion and does not review the Chessable course (blog). Our Woodpecker review has more.

Do the arithmetic before you start. Calculated from the 1,128 listed puzzles, a four-week first cycle is about 40 puzzles a day. If each later cycle takes half as long, a first cycle plus five repeats takes 28 + 14 + 7 + 3.5 + 1.75 + 0.9 days, about 55 days of solving, with the last cycles needing the whole set in a day or two. If you cannot give that block of time, the same idea works on a set you size yourself, such as a few hundred puzzles saved from one Lichess theme, which costs nothing. 1001 Chess Exercises For Club Players, at $24.99, is a similar size to Woodpecker, so it is a cheaper set rather than a shorter one.

Studer's advice, and who wrote it

GM Noel Studer's article recommends Lichess puzzles for daily practice, says the right difficulty is solving 60-70% fully correctly, and warns against Puzzle Storm as "very addictive and dangerous"; it also says never to attempt puzzles without checking the solution (article). Two things to know: the article discloses that he is an affiliate for the ChessMood course it lists first (Tactic Ninja), and ChessMood's homepage lists him among its coaches. The page shows no date. Treat it as one coach's opinion with a commercial link. He says more than one Puzzle Rush a day needs a paid Chess.com membership; Chess.com's own comparison limits Basic to five plays on day one and then once a day, which is consistent with that.

His solving routine is the most usable part. It works on any site that lets you set your own pace:

1. Set a block. He uses 30 minutes.
2. Write the full line for each puzzle, including the opponent's best reply. His test is that "whatever is not written down you simply did not see".
3. Mark in batches. He checks answers after the block, not after each puzzle, which is easier with a book than a website.
4. Score it. Out of 20 puzzles, 12 to 14 fully correct is his 60-70% band. By our own reading of that rule, not his wording, scoring 18 suggests harder puzzles and 8 suggests easier ones.

Seeing only the first move does not count as solved under his rule, so a site's green tick can flatter you.

What the research says, and its limits

Spaced practice and self-testing are well studied in memory research. Cepeda and colleagues (2006), a meta-analysis of 317 experiments, found the best gap between study sessions depends on how long you need to remember (Crossref record). It covered verbal recall tasks, not chess puzzles. So the idea that repeating puzzles on a schedule helps is plausible, but our sources do not show it for chess.

What the seller's pages do not tell you

• ChessTempo's price and what is free. We could not read it.
• Puzzle rating scales. None of the pages we read says how a puzzle rating relates to a game rating, or how one site's puzzle rating compares with another's, so do not treat a puzzle number as a measure of playing strength.
• Whether Chess.com's puzzle limits are the same everywhere. The support article describes Basic limits in text; the plan table uses icons.
• How Woodpecker's cycles interact with Chessable's own review scheduling. A Lichess blog author argues the schedule shortens intervals when it should lengthen them; we saw that only in a search snippet.

Who should skip this

Skip paid trainers if you have not finished a month of free daily puzzles, if you are under about 1000, or if you need explanations of why a move works (a course teaches that; a puzzle site mostly does not). Skip Woodpecker-style cycles if you cannot protect a two-month block of daily solving, and skip timed modes as your main work unless you already play fast chess at a high level.

The free resource that covers the same ground

Lichess puzzles and Practice, covered in our Lichess guide. For choosing in general, see how to choose a chess course; for move search, calculation courses. If you want Chess.com's paid puzzle limits lifted, Chess.com membership is where to check current plans.